Cage Match Inside the White House

[00:00] Pods of America is brought to you by SimpliSafe. [00:02] From the endless turn of the news cycle to daily tasks at work and home, we all have enough anxiety as it is. Take worrying about your home security off that list of stressors with SimpliSafe. SimpliSafe provides 24-7 protection, so no matter what's happening in the news or in life, you can always count on peace of mind at home. Lovett set up a SimpliSafe all on his own, and it was very easy, and he's very happy with it, and you can just use it right from your phone. He likes that. So he's had a great experience with it. [00:32] Customize your system to fit your needs. Then it ships fast directly to your door. The app-guided setup is simple and there's no drilling required. So you can install and arm your system in under an hour. SimpliSafe is more than just a security camera. It's a comprehensive system of sensors, indoor and outdoor cameras, and 24-7 professional monitoring. Over 5 million people value and trust SimpliSafe with their home security every day. Right now, our listeners will get 50% off a new system when you sign up for professional monitoring and your first month is free. Just visit simplisafe.com. [01:02] at simplisafe.com slash crooked. There's no safe like SimpliSafe. [01:07] My name is Dr. Corey Howe, also known as Shred Doctor. Cocoa Beach being the origination of the word Stoke, 100% believe that. We have some of the most world champion surfers originating here. We have so many outdoor water sports activities. We have space shells launching off into the atmosphere. Suns always shine and people are nice and happy. This is where everyone comes to vacation and live. I mean, what else is there not to be stoked about? Cocoa Beach, the birthplace of Stoke.

[01:37] service opens doors and at american military university it can open doors for the whole family if you have a loved one who served in the military you may qualify for reduced tuition [01:48] AMU offers flexible online programs designed to fit your schedule so you can keep moving forward wherever life takes you. [01:55] Learn more at amu.apus.edu slash military. [02:01] Open doors to the future for you and your family with the help of American Military University. [02:29] Welcome to Pod Save America, I'm Jon Favreau. And I'm Alex Wagner. Two weeks in a row. Baby! [02:39] Knicks-focused episode of Todd. That is what I said. I was like, who will even know where we're going to be? But it turns out, very fortuitous, happy to just talk about the Knicks on this podcast. Thanks for inviting me, John. Congratulations. I had nothing to do with this. I had some excellent timing because I put the boys to bed, and then I went downstairs, and I turned the game on at the beginning of the fourth quarter when the run started. Oh, my God. Fuck you with your Pacific Standard time.

[03:09] West Coast I am. Not that I ever do because I have [03:11] to the young children, but is the best. It is the best. You're so lucky. I had put my, I let them stay up a little bit late and we saw the first quarter and it was like, we can turn this off now. They were like, my eight year old started like kind of crying and he was like, I hate the next. And I said, you need to manifest positivity. I put them to bed and then they, he woke me up at seven o'clock. I know I slept in and he was like, Monday one. And then we watched highlights. I was slightly concerned that Trump had cursed them for the [03:41] out it's just about him actually physically being there true and also smart nix fans burned a bunch of sage in front of the garden yesterday because we know how to clear bad vibrations clear the trump stink out of it yeah it's just it hangs in the air especially in this weather but listen um [04:01] Well, there we go. There we go. That's it. Thanks for joining us. Make sure to subscribe to Potsdam America. We got lots to talk about on today's show. We're going to talk about Trump saying we're on the verge of a deal with Iran for the 39th time since the war began a little over 100 days ago. Who knows? This could be the big one. We'll also cover the president's latest inflation gaffe. Spoiler. [04:26] He loves it. In his attempt to quiet Republican furor over Bill Pulte by announcing his long term pick for DNI. There's also new reporting that the knives are out in Trump land, which is perfectly illustrated by an explosive new story from Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan about how these morons bumbled their way through the Epstein crisis. And finally, you will hear my conversation with our pal Ron Brownstein, one of the best political analysts out there about the midterm state of play, his take on the Graham Plattner saga, the House map, the Senate map and much more.

[04:56] please consider subscribing to a crooked and become a friend of the pod. You get ad free episodes of pod save America and all your favorite crooked pods. You also get to be supporting one of the few pro democracy, independent media outlets left in the world. Barry Weiss hasn't shut down yet or tried to murder. And you get subscriber only shows like Dan Pfeiffer's polar coaster, our special extra episode of pod save America and access to all of our excellent sub stack newsletters. So think about subscribing. [05:26] haven't already. If you have, tell a friend. Cricut.com slash friends. [05:29] Tell five friends. What's that? [05:32] Tell five friends. Tell five friends. I like that. [05:35] Thank you, Alex. Why go for one? [05:37] Don't clip your own wings. All right. I want five friends from everyone. Here we go. All right, Alex. Stop me if you've heard this one before. [05:45] The ceasefire with Iran broke down, missiles started flying again, Trump threatened to bomb the shit out of the entire country, and then at the last minute... [05:53] announced with great fanfare that he's calling off the strikes because a deal... [05:57] is finally at hand. Is this an episode from six weeks ago, three weeks ago, last week, next week, ten weeks from now? [06:04] All of the above. [06:07] You know, John, [06:08] I've come to the Chris Nolan theory of time that it's a dimension. [06:12] And so it's always happening. [06:16] We're always at war and a deal is always imminent. We're always at war with... It is omnipresent. We live in the dimension of... [06:23] Yeah, we're never not. [06:25] about, it will go on forever. Middle Asia. It has been happening. I guess.

[06:32] We're going to be talking about this [06:34] For eternity. Like, it's like, all right, let's talk about the latest almost deal with Iran, and then we'll talk about the inflation gaffe, and then we're off. [06:44] I, I think I, I, I've been thinking a lot about this and I wonder if it's time for the press to stop asking him anything about the war. [06:55] Because it's so it's like asking, like, perhaps a mentally ill person about stock tips. Like there's no use in doing that. They'll tell you some things. Now, I will say, I will say he's pretty good at that because of all the insider information, which he trades off of. So that is true. 3,700. He's quite quite adept at doing that. So the latest U.S. strikes hit targets across Iran, including apparently drinking water infrastructure. [07:25] which would likely be a war crime. And after Trump threatened to take Karg Island and assume, quote, total control of Iran's oil, he backed down with the Post claiming, quote, final points have been in both concept and great detail approved by all parties involved and then listed 10 countries. Iran was not one of them. As I mentioned, CNN has tallied this up for us. It's at least the 39th time that Trump has claimed a deal is imminent. And, you know, he did take some questions on the [07:55] But like you said, it was all the same questions and all the same crazy answers. We thought it was much more interesting to play a supercut from his his calling to Fox and Friends this morning between when he threatened to destroy the country and he announced an almost deal. He was he was there to ostensibly discuss Iran, but that only barely happened. Here are some of the highlights. I mean, I'd like to get a deal now.

[08:21] less than three or four weeks to go because, you know, once you do this, you can just go a step further. [08:27] But I don't know that America has the appetite to do what I would really much prefer doing. Look, we were in Vietnam 19 years. If it were me, I would have had that war done in three months. [08:39] But we did great in 2020. It was a rigged election. [08:42] And you saw it in California. Very interesting. If I could just say all of a sudden, oh, we have a surprise. Steve Hilton won. But Iran is a rigged election. But I shouldn't have brought that up. But let's get back. Let's get back. I just want to say to the public, it's a rigged election. We need to save America act. Period. Got it. OK, let's get back to Iran. Much simpler. Iran is very good at publicity, but they're not good at fighting. So. [09:09] I took a look and... [09:11] I must tell you, [09:12] uh, [09:13] They... [09:15] Can't believe the press they get. [09:17] They can't even believe it. And they told me, they said, it's amazing how well we're doing in the papers. We're not doing so well. They're negotiating with us to make a deal. [09:25] They did an editorial today about... [09:28] We're not hitting them hard enough. I mean, it's just not hitting them hard enough. We dropped $250 million worth of bombs on them last night. You know, the whole thing is crazy. Part of the problem is that they read the fake news. I mean, because Fox is great. All the anchors on Fox have been fantastic, from Sean to Jesse, Laura. I mean, they've all been... [09:47] Great, everybody. Every single anchor. It's been great. You guys have been amazing.

[09:53] Excellent. Seems like he's locked in, huh? [09:55] Dude, okay, I mean like where do we even begin with this? First of all, there's so many things to call attention to. [10:03] The fact that he had to, in the middle of all of this, go off on the 2020 election and Brian Kilmeade is like, I shouldn't have brought that up. I shouldn't have brought that up. And he says Iran is my fault, though. It's my fault. I took us off topic. And then Trump says, let's get back to Iran, a much simpler situation. [10:21] Um, he sounds like an old, angry person who's not yet even stood up from bed. You know, he has that kind of the throaty congestion of someone who's just ranting from from bed. Like and it's just obviously it's just association at this point, just word salads. None of it makes sense. [10:51] the American public feel assured that they have their hands on the wheel here, that they got their arms around this thing. Well, look at Vietnam. That took so long. Yeah, no, dude, we don't want to do that again. Also, his whole thing about, you know, I do what I want to do, but the American people might not have the stomach for it. He wants to do this big war. He wants to keep going with the war. [11:12] He wants more war, harder war. [11:18] At one point, he's pressed to give his message to the Iranian people. And Trump says, and this is a quote, my message to the Iranian people is they're afraid because they have no guns and the other side has guns. That's not a message to the Iranian people, I don't think, is it? That is not a message to the Iran. Every time someone has asked him that this whole war, though, he confuses.

[11:42] regime. And so everyone's like, what about the Iranian people? And he's like, they're running scared. That's what they're doing. And it's like, they some people are specifically mentioning the Iranian people. And he, of course, does not give a shit about them, even though that was, you know, that was one excuse for why we were doing this in the first place. [11:58] I also love the notion that the Iranian regime... [12:02] that Moshtaba Arremini, who has not been seen in public since this began, is calling Trump to be like, it's amazing how well we're doing in the papers. The papers. I grabbed the New York Times here. I grabbed the post this morning. You should have seen the wood on the post. Amazing. I'm getting amazing press. [12:22] They put the Knicks on the back page. I was right there in the front. And that was a great game, Mr. President. He also starts talking at some point about Tiananmen Square and how it takes a – it starts the drivers of the tanks in Tiananmen Square who mowed down citizens, at which point he's cut off. And they're like, we only have a minute, Mr. President. They literally cut him off on Fox & Friends because he's so addled. Can I say, though, seriously, John? [12:52] Yeah. [13:01] The story of whenever this ends, or maybe it never ends because time is dimension, but when it theoretically comes to a conclusion, the story of American war crimes in Iran will live with us as our legacy for decades. And we on Runaway Country had talked to.

[13:21] A retired master sergeant at the, what is it called? The Civilian Protection Center of Excellence, which was a department in the DOD, which was set up to mitigate and prevent civilian deaths. Like, for example, bombing a girls' school or bombing water infrastructure. And Pete Hegseth wrote in and dismantled it effectively. Like, civilian deaths are not beside the point. [13:51] And we, I mean, [13:53] The... [13:55] This administration owns these civilian deaths, and we don't have a good tally of them because there's so much opacity with regards to this war, even as it concerns American deaths. And we have a free press. But at some point, the numbers are going to come out. And Donald Trump will own every single one of those deaths for a deal that looks like it will be nothing on par with the JCPOA. [14:25] editorial board saying that he's not bombing hard enough. He's not doing enough, right? Because they're hawks over there. He also calls the wall. He's like, I know that you guys own them, but they're trash. He said to the Fox people, referring to Murdoch. And he's like, what do you what do they want from me? We just dropped $250 million worth of bombs on them last night. So now he is bragging to the American people about using their tax dollars to drop bombs on Iran that hit water

[14:55] potentially cause civilian death. So now he's telling people like, hey, what do you want from me? I spent your money killing people in Iran for no reason last night. It's the first time we've also gotten any kind of price tag from him. I mean, it's so embarrassing that this is like the braggadocio about killing civilians is the only way we get some transparency about the from this White House about what the damage and the sort of collateral on the table is. It's like [15:25] the football away yet again, or is this finally Charlie Brown's moment? It seems like it's still just a memorandum of understanding. So Trump said that in the Oval, which means it's sort of the same deal as before deal. The Israelis are apparently surprised, and they said they're not part of this deal at all. So no matter what the deal is, it's not solving the conflict between [15:55] said that the Ayatollah has agreed already. Iran is not saying that. There's an Iranian news agency said there's a high chance the agreement will be approved. So like, you know, maybe we're going to get there. But, you know, [16:07] It feels like we're right back to if it does get approved, what it is, is the end of the naval blockade, reopening of the strait, and then kicking all the nuclear issues down the road for more negotiations that I'm sure will not go anywhere else. [16:24] And there's there's definitely going to be some sweetening to the tune of I mean, Marco Rubio on the Hill said they were not going to trade sanctions relief for reopening the strait. But and Nahal Tuzi has like a breakdown of this in Politico today. There's definitely ways that they can make sure money flows to Iran, basically to fill back up the coffers and pay them for reopening, pay them to reopen the strait.

[16:54] We may not know about it as American taxpayers, but it is certainly there is going to be a shell game going on inside the bowels of the federal government to ensure that money goes to the Iranian regime. Because otherwise, why would they do any of this? No, of course. And what happens, what will happen is some intrepid reporters will find out what the shell game is and report it in a in a great story. And then someone will ask the White House about it and they'll basically say, fuck you, fake news. And then everyone will go on to the next thing. [17:24] Brian Kilmeade who said, "Mr. President, you're like an anaconda, squeezing the life out of the enemy, slowly squeezing them to death." He said it like four times. Yeah, he was really happy with his analogy. He was like, "But did you hear the anaconda thing? I'm workshopping it." [17:42] Before we move on, what did you make of his rant about the California election? Did you realize that Steve Hilton won because... [17:48] Donald Trump complained about Spencer Pratt losing. Yeah, what did he say about Spencer Pratt? He was like, the kid got shafted. He got shafted. But then I said something. I said something, and now... [17:59] Now we got Steve Hilton. Now he made it through. [18:01] Yeah, it was happening to Steve Hilton, too. But now I mean, it's it's good that someone's got their eyes on California. We guys we know how you operate. And it's a it's a complicated, you know, con, right? You think, oh, well, the gubernatorial race matters more. But no. [18:15] What this is, is about singular and discrete races that are stolen for no apparent reason. But just to throw you off the scent. Yes, it's about the L.A. mayor, the incumbent, who wanted to face Spencer Pratt much more than she wanted to face a progressive challenger. And yet did her best to rig the election so that she could get that progressive challenger and not Spencer Pratt.

[18:45] It's incredible, buddy. Man, these people. But like, can I just say, the election fraud and going back to 2020 is like so much more animates this dude than actually Iran. I mean, he's both incompetent and incoherent on Iran, but he's also bored of it. Like he doesn't really have – like he would much rather – he wants to talk about the Save America Act. He wants to talk about raw power and the stealing of elections and getting his election deniers, having them act with the full force of the federal government. [19:15] This guy up in the morning. Yes, as you can tell from the tone in his voice. [19:27] Pod Save America is brought to you by Nutrafol. Real change comes from the small healthy habits you do every day that quietly add up to big improvements. That's the idea behind Nutrafol. It's built around a simple, consistent approach to hair health that works from within and delivers visible results over time, not overnight. Nutrafol is the number one dermatologist recommended hair growth supplement brand, and it's the number one hair growth supplement brand personally used by dermatologists. Nutrafol's hair growth supplements are peer-reviewed, [19:57] approach. Nutrafol offers multiple formulas for men and women tailored to different life stages like postpartum or menopause and lifestyle factors such as a plant-based diet so you get the personalized support that's right for you. Adding Nutrafol to your daily routine is easy. Order online, no prescription needed, with automated deliveries and free shipping to keep you on track. Let your hair become one less thing, taking up space in your head and see thicker, stronger, faster growing hair with less shedding in just three to six months with Nutrafol. For a

[20:27] subscription, and free shipping when you visit Nutrafol.com and enter promo code CROOKED. That's Nutrafol.com spelled N-U-T-R-A-F-O-L.com, promo code CROOKED. [20:38] Pod Save America is brought to you by CookUnity. I love CookUnity. And I just had a meal last night. What did I have last night? I had the Thai beef curry with rice. And who knows what I'm going to have tonight? Maybe it's like a good chicken dish they gave me. Anyway, I've used CookUnity for years, long before they were ever a sponsor. It's great. It's the first chef-led meal delivery service that makes your meals in small batches inside local micro kitchens across the U.S. [21:08] So every dish arrives with the kind of freshness you'd get at the restaurant itself. Meals from Michelin-starred chefs, James Beard winners, and Food Network stars. Go to cookunity.com slash crooked or use code crooked before checkout for 50% off your first week. [21:38] CookUnity works with some of the best chefs in the country to bring creative, delicious meals to your door. There are hundreds of dishes to choose from, and the menu is updated constantly. Taste what happens when real, award-winning chefs make fresh, small-batch meals just for you. Go to cookunity.com slash crooked or enter code crooked before checkout to get 50% off your first order. That's 50% off your first order by using code crooked or going to cookunity.com slash crooked.

[22:03] Well, deal or no deal with Iran, it's looking like it may be too late for Trump to turn the economy around before the midterms. And per usual, he's making it abundantly clear that he doesn't care. New inflation data from Trump's own Department of Labor shows that prices rose in May to a three-year high for the third straight month, with energy prices up 24% from a year ago. Data on wholesale inflation released Thursday morning put that measure at its highest since late 2022. [22:31] of how much people's financial struggles are weighing on him. Here's a few highlights to jog your memory. Do you believe the price of oil and gas will be lower before the midterm elections? [22:42] I hope so. I mean, I think so. It could be. It could be the same or maybe a little bit higher. I thought that oil prices would go much higher. I look today, it's like at 102. And that's a very small price to pay for getting rid of a nuclear weapon from people that are really mentally deranged. Affordability is a hoax that was started by Democrats. How much longer will Americans continue to see these high gas prices? [23:12] American financial situation, I don't think about anybody. I think about one thing. We cannot let Iran have a nuclear weapon. That's all. I don't care about the midterms. Look what happened last night. That was... [23:24] the prelude to the midterms. [23:26] Well, I think... [23:27] Good news. [23:28] We have a new contender for the crown. Here's what Trump said on Wednesday in response to a question about the latest inflation data.

[23:36] Sir, Mr. President, about the latest inflation number, which came out this morning. Could that be a great... No, I love it. The numbers were great. You know what I really love? I love the inflation. You know why? [23:46] Because there's still [23:47] I love the inflation. He loves the inflation. God, I wish they could pan to other faces in the room. You know, that's good. Yeah. Someone in the pool. Just go to Susie Wiles's face. I love when this is being said. [24:06] I love the inflation. I love the inflation. I mean, this is the downside, John, of having a malignant narcissist in office. Like they can't summon empathy when empathy is the prerequisite from staving off the the political fallout from stopping the bleeding here. Like they the the war is so catastrophically out of Trump's hands to a certain degree because he refuses to engage in diplomacy and doesn't really give a shit and is also an idiot. [24:36] But like if he's going to try and manage the political reality that he and his party are facing, you got to start the sentence with empathy. And I feel your pain and I know this economy is bad and it's tough to be a working class American. But – [24:48] X, Y and Z about Iran and the stability of the globe or whatever. But he is constitutionally unable to summon to even pretend not only is he constitutionally unable to pretend to be empathetic. He's the opposite. He is digging the knife in further. Bill Clinton's message was, I feel your pain. Donald Trump's messages. I cause your pain. And I'm fucking glad I do it. And tough shit.

[25:12] That's me. I cause your pain. You and your dumb cars. You and your dumb desire to put food on the table. Don't talk to me about health care. [25:22] I need another million for my ballroom. Now, for my money, I still think the reigning champ is I don't care, but I don't think about Americans' financial situation at all. I don't know. I love the inflation. It's funny because he uses the article in front of it, right? I love the inflation. So that makes it a little funnier. [25:42] Well, no, he says it's actually the full quote is so good. You know what I really love? I love the inflation. You could argue, right? [25:52] He's like, wait, hold it. He's teased it up. He's like, I'm about to, you know what I really love? [25:56] the inflation. Like it's so sadistic. Honestly, I don't think about Americans financial situations is part of a bigger question. And I'm not excusing it at all. I think it was a disastrous quote. But this is psychotic. This is someone who's like, you like the pain? How about a little bit more? You know what I really like? Fucking over the American public. It's always dangerous to do this. But I was trying to think of like, what was he actually [26:26] old, very old mind, he was thinking, you know what, this data, it's going to be great because as soon as the war is over, [26:34] This inflation is going to come right down and then I'm going to take all this credit for inflation falling. So I love the like, I think it's a little bit like it doesn't make sense. It doesn't. No, of course not. Of course not. Because he's talking about ongoing inflation. It still doesn't. Well, he doesn't know. He also doesn't know what inflation is, really. Yes. Can I just say also, I don't moonlight as a petroleum engineer, but I will for this podcast. Yes. I try and I try and come prepared.

[26:58] Like the gas prices are not going down, even if the Strait of Hormuz opens back up. [27:03] tomorrow. No. This is baked. [27:07] This is this is where I didn't know the Washington Post is talking about the reality of these like ships getting through back through the straight. They're like, even the hundreds of fully loaded tankers that have idled in the straight since last February will not be able to quickly move their cargo. Vessels are now so coated with barnacles that teams of divers will need to be dispatched to clean them. I didn't know that. [27:37] an issue, the issue in the midterms. This is going to be an issue for J.D. Vance in the Republican primary and whoever decides to run against him from outside the administration. I mean, this is like by by by act by 2028, it won't maybe it won't be. Hopefully it won't be as much of an issue. But like 2027, when the primaries are happening. Yeah. 100 percent. You're so right to say that. That is [28:07] Because the I mean, again, I'm not a petroleum engineer, but the refineries and the production facilities have taken offline and it takes months to get them back up and running. And like if the oil supplies I also didn't know this, if oil supplies drop low enough, then it breaks down. If there's not actually oil running through the pipeline, it can break down the production systems. So like if they don't resolve this in the next several weeks, there's like a catastrophic supply side issue where the infrastructure starts breaking down.

[28:37] That's well, like fixing all that is going to take. Forget about the fucking travel season. We're talking about holiday plans, Thanksgiving, Christmas. Like, again, I'm not rooting for any of this. I didn't say that. I don't know why I'm saying again. I'm not a politician, but this is a fucked up situation. And yet. [28:54] I, I, [28:55] Well, and not and yet the incompetence and the refusal to acknowledge reality here. [29:01] is makes you think they really want to lose that there's something again they're just it's it's self-flagellation politically speaking here's the other challenge and i'm no geopolitical expert but if they uh come to a deal where it's just about opening the strait for money and for ending the naval blockade and then they go on to negotiate the nuclear issue which is going to be [29:27] Tricky, to say the least. And they don't include Israel in the deal. Then, as we get into the fall, and... [29:36] Trump has his elections and we have our elections here. Netanyahu has his elections in Israel. Like as long as Israel continues to be at war with Lebanon and firing, you know, firing at Hezbollah and Hezbollah is firing rockets in Israel and Iran doesn't want to let those rockets go unanswered. And then Iran gets involved like that. We're not bringing peace to the Middle East with them with a memo of understanding. [30:06] terms and in the

[30:07] presidential primaries, that the Middle East is now [30:11] like permanently in this state of, I mean, there's always been a lot of conflict in the Middle East, but like this latest conflict continues as a sort of like a low boil, I guess in the best case scenario, a low boil. But like and they're going to have to deal with it. They're going to deal with the fallout of this war for years. It is. This is what I mean by time is a dimension. The war is ongoing. The war never ends. We are constantly on the brink of a peace deal. Call me in 2059. [30:41] Oil and gas executives have been warning the White House that, as you said, that gas prices are likely to spike. So they're hearing this from the oil executives themselves. This is not like this is not just some just us talking about it. And then Politico has a story on Wednesday with the headline, the die has been cast. Trump allies fear it's too late to reverse economic woes. I also think there was a funny quote that I just saw from John Cornyn, who is liberated now. He spoke to The New York Times and he said he said this about Donald Trump. [31:11] He's going to have the most miserable two years of his life in the last two years of his term, I think, because I think November is going to be a disaster. [31:21] You know what? I mean, fuck. I know. What's going to be miserable? I mean... [31:28] miserable things to Democrats who have backbones and certainly not to Republicans who might actually stand up to him. I mean, John Cornyn has no reason to continue to enable the agenda of this madman. And yet, given the opportunity to break with him, hasn't. I mean, it's just such cold comfort when you hear the guys that are on their way out the door suddenly sort of develop a moral compass. It's such bullshit. And by the way, they haven't delivered on anything. There have been some pretty big ticket issues that they could have done something about in the last week,

[31:58] when your backbone's made of actual bone matter and not, what am I even saying? John Cornyn, what the fuck ever. What the fuck ever is what I say. I know, I agree with everything you said and then I also love hearing quotes like that. So it's, you know, to get a little bit of both. I get mad because I'm like, where have you been? But also, yeah, I- [32:19] I think I think what he said is right. I hope so. Well, and I think that there's a you know, you should be dragging all of these. Every time an administration official goes in, goes up to the hill, a fairy gets her wings. Every time an American administration official goes to the the hill and has to testify under real questioning, they prove themselves to be absolute clowns. And someone ends up losing their job. Like, just look at the, you know, look at the track record of Pam Bondi and Kristi Noem and, you know, Tulsi Gabbard, [32:49] So the once Democrats control Congress, and I think there's a likelihood that's both houses like there's going to be some real investigation into the absolute. [32:59] I'm not going to say I mean, the amorality, the potential criming and the deep corruption in this administration. And they're going to have to answer for it. All of it. And then and then they're going to continue fighting with each other, which we we hear is happening right now. [33:16] Apparently, Trump Trump is not happy about any of this. And it's putting a real strain on the support of workplace culture that he has tried so hard to build.

[33:29] Trump is, quote, increasingly frustrated with everyone from his own team to the Senate. He's pissed and people are not recognizing the level of pissed that he is. And here's another White House ally talking about Trump's staff. Quote, knives are out in some capacity, this person said. I mean, people are stabbing people like it's chaos. The chaos is like creeping back. Sounds like a fun place to work. [33:52] Well, [33:53] Good benefits. [33:56] Great, great. The ladder is steep, but you can climb it. [34:02] I don't... [34:03] The knives are out. Like if you thought, should we be surprised that this the most incompetent and corrupt White House in American history is beset by infighting and backstabbing? Absolutely not. I guess what's marginally interesting to me about that is. [34:21] those quotes are choice. [34:25] but that it hasn't spilled out as much. I'm setting aside like Bongino gate and all that, that infighting hasn't spilled out in the sort of real criminology of this White House, the way that it did in Trump 1.0, given that things are going so much worse for Trump, and he's so much more addled and obviously less. I mean, maybe he's asleep more. So that offers a reprieve and people can, you know, unruffle their feathers. But it's interesting to me that there [34:55] backstabbing sort of anecdotes coming out of this White House the way there was in Trump one. I don't know what that owes to. Maybe it's Susie Wiles, but it sure still doesn't sound like a good place to work. I mean, nothing is. Once you've been to the Crooked Media headquarters, you're going to

[35:09] The bar is very high. Very high. My guess on this is that the percentage of like diehard loyalists is much higher in the second term. And so all the people who might have had a conscience or wanted to speak out or thought things were going too far, they're all gone now. And so it's just the hardcore true believers. And so if you're starting to get knives out among those people, that's that's the good stuff right there. That's when you know things are combustible. [35:39] And I would say, [35:41] And I'm sure we'll talk about this later when we talk about the slush fund. There is the carrot on the stick of personal enrichment in a way that is like it's almost an explicit promise. Like if you're in this White House and Pam Bondi was doing stock trades, they all have sort of various honeypots that they're dipping into. That will keep you there in your seat maybe a little bit longer because you have side hustles in a way that that was not an option or that they hadn't discovered that maybe in Trump 1.0. [36:11] reason to stay longer, perhaps, than you would. I mean, you know, personal, what is it? Personalized bourbon doesn't just grow on trees, John. And if you're Kash Patel, being FBI director, you know, membership has its perks. It sure does. So Trump was, of course, pissed that Republicans keep defying him. And that's like one of the things he's really mad about. And it looks like Republican

[36:41] you and I talked about last week, has led to Trump announcing his long term pick for DNI. [36:50] And it's that's U.S. attorney and former SEC chair Jay Clayton. So that got announced today on Thursday, presumably because enough Republicans said, fuck, no, we're not dealing with Bill Pulte is a bridge too far. [37:11] director, even a temporary DNI, which some of them said absolutely not about, that even if they do that, then what they were going to do is hold up 702 or the reauthorization of 702, which is what gives the federal government warrantless spy powers. [37:26] Got to make sure the government has warrantless spy powers, right? That is a, again, that is a bipartisan push. But anyway, so now the question is, does this do it for Congress now that they've got, and also... [37:41] What do you think about Jay Clayton? Okay, so... [37:44] Two things. One, as I understand it, and our Crackerjack fact-checking team can probably disabuse me of this if it's incorrect, but Pulte... [37:53] remains i think the times is reporting the current plan is for pulty to continue to serve as acting director until clayton is confirmed by the senate yes and and and bill once and he once again there there was another story about apparently he called tulsi gabbard bill pulty and was like um i know you said you're leaving next month or whatever but you're out now i'm starting and she's like what the fuck she's like what happened the president should tell me that and then she called the president and he was like well i what do you want your last day to be and so now it's going to be

[38:23] Well, that's because he knows he has, you know, the clock is running and these, you know, Tish James mortgage fraud documents don't just find themselves. He has a special skill. Well, I mean, he's in there to be faffing around in classified material to try and drum up reasons why elections have been stolen or Democrats are corrupt or whatever the fuck it is. But I don't like the idea of Bill Pulte being anywhere near that. [38:49] the Office of National Intelligence. Like that is setting aside Jay Clayton, like that is alarming. And that is every reason why Democrats, they should, first of all, Senate Republicans like John Cornyn, who are, you know, intent on giving the president, keeping him in line, they got the wool pulled over their eyes on the slush fund. I know we're talking about that coming up, but they shouldn't get their wool, the wool pulled over their eyes on Bill Pulte. Like that man needs to be [39:16] locked out [39:18] of the intelligence infrastructure and get a restraining order, basically, because even two weeks on the job for him is too many. And if that means holding up FISA reauthorization until and unless that happens, then that's what should happen. Like he is a danger to democracy. This is basically what that's basically what I haven't seen other Democrats yet. But Mark Warner, who's the ranking member on Intel, said that Warner was like, this is fine. I'm like, I wish [39:48] But there's no way we're reauthorizing FISA unless we get assurances that there's no Bill Pulte at all.

[39:56] Thank you. [39:57] Bill Pulte needs to be extradited to a different country and get nowhere near a passport office. I will say, I mean, Clayton oversaw a lot of the review of the Epstein documents. Oh, yeah, because he was SDM. He was the one, I think, his prosecutors brought the case against Nicolas Maduro, which was nominally the reason Trump went in and seized Maduro. [40:27] won him favor. He also, in recent days, has been raising alarms about fraud in California and the vote count. So like I noticed that. Yeah, he said he said, I'm not saying there's fraud, but the laws, the way they're written in California, present the opportunity for fraud. I'm like, OK, now we know why Jay Clayton was just totally. I mean, that's and that's a prerequisite for any. But like. [40:49] I don't know. There's a part of me that thinks, OK, maybe Clayton gets in there and he proves himself to be more of a bulwark against Trump's most lawless impulses. Or maybe he becomes more of a stooge. Like Todd Blanche was a kind of respected, like white, you know, white shoe law firm kind of guy and has turned out to be like the architect of our national nightmare. So I'm a little worried. I'm worried about anybody that meets Trump's standards or substandards for any of these positions. [41:19] And Mark Warner, people, Democrats who have like very good reputations on this are signing off on him and saying he's good. That's reassuring. But, you know, I worry something happens to you when you walk into the Trump administration. You have to check your morals and your brain at the door, especially if you're someone who wants the job. That's that's a that's a red flag. No one in their right mind should want this. Also want the promotion. Yeah.

[41:43] idiot ass administration understand there's a legislative branch that like needs to confirm this but like why did he nominate this guy as the house is out and the senate's out like this is nothing nothing's going to happen till i think june 23rd so fisa authorization is going to expire almost no matter what even if the candidate is more to the liking of the upper chamber yeah and again is it some kind of a scheme or is it just typical incompetence it could be [42:19] So [42:22] Pod Save America is brought to you by Stamps.com. [42:25] We could all use a few more hours, even minutes in the day for ourselves. Skip your trip to the post office and stop letting mailing steal your precious little time with Stamps.com. With Stamps.com, you can print postage and shipping labels from your computer or phone 24-7 with up to 90% off UPS, USPS, FedEx, and more. No lines, no trips, no waiting. Get everything done in minutes and even schedule free pickup so carriers come right to you. Whether you're sending letters, contracts, important legal documents, or packages, Stamps.com makes mailing simple for businesses of all sizes, [42:55] multi-location offices. You can even send certified mail with proof of delivery right from your desk. If mailing is taking more time and more money than it should, try stamps.com free for four weeks and get a welcome kit. Go to stamps.com slash PSA to get this offer today. That's S-T-A-M-P-S dot com slash PSA. Stamps.com slash PSA. Taxes and fees apply.

[43:16] Positive America is brought to you by Sundays. If you've ever had a dog who's picky when it comes to food, we do. You know how surprisingly stressful it can be. You'll try every brand under the sun in the hopes that your dog will finally find the one they like. But maybe the answer is simply that your dog knows the difference between processed brown pellets and real food. Sundays for dogs is different. They start with over 80% all natural meats and then finish with superfoods like kale, ginger, blueberries. All of the ingredients are gently air dried instead of using high heat. Sundays doesn't look or smell like traditional store-bought dog food. [43:46] jerky, the kind humans would eat. No fillers, no nutritional blends, no chemicals, just simple, complete nutrition. Founded by Dr. Tori Waxman, Sundays was created to meet her high standards as a veterinarian and as a dog parent. And the best part, Sundays requires no fridge, no freezer, no prep, no mess. You get the quality of a home-cooked meal with a scoop and serve ease of kibble. It's what dog food should have been all along. [44:07] Our dog, Leo, can definitely tell the difference between real food and dog food because he really likes the real food and is always trying to get it off the table. But now that he has Sundays, he is very excited every time he eats. We pour it into the bowl. He runs to the bowl. And it's easy to store. It doesn't smell bad like some of the other dog food. And we love it. Make the switch to Sundays. Go right now to Sundays for dogs dot com slash crooked 50 and get 50 percent off your first order. Or you can use code crooked 50 at checkout.

[44:37] 50 sundays for dogs.com slash crooked 50 or use code crooked 50 at checkout on the slush fund that you mentioned uh the atlantic sarah fitzpatrick who broke those stories about cash patel drinking on the [44:51] has new reporting, [44:52] that administration officials are quietly telling allies that, quote, "plans for some form of payout [44:58] remain on track. So we've talked about this to everyone that, you know, Blanche said it's we're not moving forward with it. But then Republicans in Congress blocked any provision in the ICE funding bill that would have killed it for good. And then Trump talks about how much he loves it still. And he loves the slush fund. And sure enough, it sounds like from this reporting and and Sarah talked to quite a few officials, current and former in the Justice Department, [45:28] that basically the plan could be that anyone who wants a payout from the slush fund or from what used to be the slush fund would just sue the government because that's who you'd sue for that. And then the federal government, the DOJ, will just settle. [45:44] and settle for an amount of money. [45:45] Some amount of money is a payout. And that's that. [45:48] Even if the courts are like, because they wouldn't take their case to court because the court would be like, well, that's fucking crazy. You're on video almost murdering a cop. So, no, we're not going to pay you any money or find in favor of you. And they'll say, well, we don't have to go to court because the DOJ will settle with us. Yeah. I mean, it's not an adversarial lawsuit. Therefore, it would be thrown out in court.

[46:18] The true story of corruption is what they're doing behind closed doors inside the guts of the federal government. And I will just plug Runaway Country one more time, because this week we talked to ProPublica reporter Robert Fattorecci, who's been breaking amazing stories, including the way in which the Trump kids are dipping their hands in the deep coffers of the Department of Defense and, you know, making 10x investments on venture capital funds or rare earth mineral startups or drone contractors. [46:48] of cash floating around in the American federal government, and they have figured out a way to tap that maple tree, if you will. And the slush fund is exemplary of the opacity. Once people stop, once these kind of issues stop being adjudicated publicly in courts or, you know, politically, and it's just a kind of behind the scenes process, a settlement fund at the DOJ that hush, hush, you can tap if you have friends at the DOJ. That's where the most brazen [47:18] And I have every reason to believe that they intend on. I mean, Sarah's reporting, yes, but it's also Todd Blanche refused to write down like he wouldn't submit a written written statement saying the slush fund is outlawed. Like their behavior in and around the cancellation of the slush fund was so transparent. It was clear that they were going to try and resurrect it in some fashion.

[47:48] as he heads towards retirement and indicated he may not vote to confirm Blanche unless the fund is truly dead. Gee, you fucking think, Tom? [47:57] Why are you even alive? What are you doing, Bill Cassidy? What is the point of you? I think I said this last time we were on the podcast lesson. What is the point of you, Bill Cassidy? I'm [48:07] Like, how cuck can you be to this person? [48:10] Madman and his stooges. [48:13] When is enough enough? Apparently there there is no limit. And I do think that what you just mentioned about Blanche, that is one leverage point here is don't confirm Blanche unless, you know, they put it in a court filing. Right. You've got to you can't just say it anymore. [48:43] That's the kind of fight you can pick that actually is, you know, gets more attention than just we don't want Todd Blanche because Todd Blanche sucks. Right. Like we have like you have some good examples. I think on the slush fund, too, I would make like this is an extreme example that tells the whole story of the Trump administration. And if I were Democrats, I would hammer it every single day from now into the midterms. [49:13] money and give it to criminals who beat cops and abuse children.

[49:18] Yeah, that's because those are a lot of the Jane says itself. Somehow, somehow, so many of the January six convicts are also have either gone on to commit child abuse or had in the past. So that's just that's interesting. But yeah, these are the people that they want to give your money to if they win. And this is one area, too, where there's a lot of things that Trump's doing where if Democrats take Congress, unfortunately, we're not going to be able to do anything until we have a Democratic president. So everyone's going to have to keep fighting. [49:48] everything where you were just talking about happening behind closed doors, happening in secret with the slush fund, with the other stuff, Democrats, Democrats, [49:55] take Congress, they're going to be able to shine a light on all of that and make sure that it doesn't happen. A lot of it, at least. And make sure it doesn't happen. Slush fund is a perfect example of that. And so I would be saying that all through the fall. Like you elect Republicans and they are going to Donald Trump is going to take your money and use it to pay out. [50:17] criminals, criminals who beat cops. John, they're such jabronis, though, like they probably can't even pull it off in secret. Like they had, they quote Stanley Woodward Jr., who's an associate attorney general who signed off on the sludge fund. And he responds, we're on it to a post by Lindsey Graham that suggested victims of the weaponization fund could still be compensated through other means. It's like, you're not supposed to say that, dude. He then deleted the post. [50:47] Thank you. [50:47] They're so dumb. They are so dumb. And the criminals who are going to try to get the payouts, they're not going to be able to stop themselves from bragging about it because they're also dumb. Yeah, totally.

[50:57] Yeah. Videos of themselves rolling around on beds of money like Demi Moore and indecent proposal. Yeah. Like videos that they took of themselves breaking into the Capitol and trying to, you know, exactly. So speaking of knives out in Trump world, let's talk about the explosive story in The Times about just how badly the administration fucked up the entire Epstein saga. [51:27] just generally acting like morons. What were some of your favorite bits? [51:31] Oh, God. I mean, do I have to talk about abused nipples or will you talk about that? [51:37] I really don't want to have to talk. You know what? We're going to have to tackle it. Tommy and I did a lot of nipple talk responding to this on YouTube. When don't you? [51:46] Sorry, we don't do a lot of public nipple talk. Right, okay. Good clarification. We did lead off with this yesterday on the Pod Save America YouTube, but that's why I want to hear your take. Well, that's why you should be a subscriber, huh? Exactly. That's a great place to plug our YouTube. [52:01] Again, let's table abuse nipples. Maybe we won't even get to it. We'll drive people to the subscription only YouTube. [52:08] rapid response. I think just one of the things that grabbed me initially was the idea that they're sitting in the sit room. Trump isn't there. And it's like the Cracker Jack A team to figure out what to do about the Epstein scandal. And it's like Susie Wiles, David Warrington, fine. Caroline Levitt, [52:25] Stephen Chung, [52:26] Pam Bondi, Kash Patel. This is like, I'm trying to think, is it like a gang of like Rasputins or Yago? Like what's the appropriate character delineation for this group of malicious idiots? But anyway, then I, of course, my...

[52:44] I focus a lot on the J.D. Vance of it all because in these inside Maggie and Jonathan have done great reporting and they did another similar sort of piece about how America decided to go to war, which also involves a group of a lot of J.D. Vance malicious idiots. [53:14] a major problem for Trump and he needs to do something about it and they need to be aggressive. And, you know, he needs to he he presses for the administration to release all the files and even the unsubstantiated allegations and anecdotes. But then he also has like the most dumb fuck ideas ever, like having suggesting that that Tucker Carlson go and interview Ghislaine Maxwell, [53:44] and is like asking a six-year-old to go eat a whole bunch of cotton candy and then take the teacups ride. Like it's all sensory overload. Can you even imagine what that conversation would be like? I can't. I don't know. What did you think? Also, well, so I had a couple of like big thoughts on the whole thing, big picture thoughts. One is that the people in the administration who most understand like what really drives and angers the MAGA base, your J.D. Vance's, your Dan Bongino's,

[54:14] Thank you. [54:14] Maybe sources for this story, that could be likely. But clearly, like... [54:19] They, what's awesome about this is that they, you know, spoke up and are trying to stop this and trying to fix it. And yet they are going to be tarnished forever by not having achieved any of what they set out to achieve. So it's not like, like, no, no one in the MAGA base is going to be like reading this and thinking like, oh, you know, J.D. Vance, our guy on the inside, he tried his best. [54:42] Did you read Maggie and Jonathan's TikTok? Come on. Give the guy some credit. No one's going to think that. Yeah. So J.D. Vance is like, I have a great idea. We'll have Tucker interview Ghislaine Maxwell. And then there's like, that's kind of crazy. And then Todd Blanche is like, I'll interview Ghislaine Maxwell. And then the White House counsel floats giving her a pardon. And then the rest of the room strongly disagrees. And then Stephen Chung says, quote, pardoning Maxwell, a trafficker of young girls would create a huge PR problem. [55:12] our problem. No fucking shit, huh? [55:14] Wow. Good thing you're in this job. You're a bright guy. Well, but also not even a gesture. I know. Towards the morality here. Not a word they understand. The ethics never, ever come into debate. It is just about spin. It is just about minimizing the drama for the Trump administration. It is nothing about the victims and survivors who went through this hell.

[55:44] I'm excited. [55:45] Not that it should surprise anybody, but really, it's astounding. And then J.D. Vance is like, then they thought when they were coming up with that wonderful memo that did nothing but caused them more trouble. [55:57] They had this original plan to have Todd Blanche go on Joe Rogan to talk about this. And then J.D.'s like... [56:05] Well, how about I go instead of Todd Blanche? And I can take a few questions about this, but because it's me, the vice president, and not Todd Blanche, he'll have to ask about other stuff, like the administration's progress on helping working people and the tax cuts and the bill. It's like, well, have you listened to Joe Rogan? And then, of course, Joe Rogan was like, I'm only taking J.D. Vance and not Todd Blanche because who the fuck is Todd Blanche? And so and then it never goes anywhere. But I did like that little anecdote just because J.D. clearly has some really the mind of a communication strategist. [56:35] want to hear about how we're helping working families and how we're gutting the social safety net to help those working families. Also, Pam Bondi released her fake dummy Epstein files and [56:45] without any consultation with the White House. And this is a small thing, small thing, but she was left out on some of the emails about the memo. And the reason is, is because it said, Bondi rarely used her Justice Department email and was not on the chain where the group worked on the memo. The Attorney General rarely used her Justice Department email. [57:09] Remember 26? Why is there some irony in that that I'm missing? No, no. We've always we've always cared a lot about something. She's dealing with classified information. Opsec here. And so and then Dan Bongino screams at Pam Bondi.

[57:24] Yells at Susie Wiles, storms out of meetings. He said to Pam Bondi, you fuck this thing up from the start. The way you've been talking about this, the dumb fucking charade with the Epstein files, the there on my desk nonsense, all the promises to the folks out there. So that was fun. I threatened to quit. Bongino, definitely a source. Also, I like this part of it. Privately, Bongino seethed. In conversations with confidants, he lamented what the job had cost him. [57:47] millions of dollars in podcast revenue family time his audience just sandwiched in between the millions in podcasts yeah i left i'm sorry millions yeah no i've left to spend more time with my audience um it's like okay no it's good to know where your kids stand now they now they know for sure we should sandwich between your your like your downloads and your youtube subscribers [58:17] from the, from this, we should at least talk about a nipple gate because, uh, otherwise people are going to think that we're weird that we didn't, we just threw it out there and then, and then didn't actually explain it. We don't want them to think we're perverts. No, right. So that's the president. That would be the president. So when they looked through all the emails and all the files, um, they found, uh, [58:36] allegations from a woman named Sarah Ransom, and she claimed that she knew a girl in Epstein's sex trafficking ring named Jen, who said she had sex with Trump. Ransom also claimed that Jen had told her that Trump had a predilection for nipples and that he had aggressively flicked and sucked hers. She wrote that she had seen evidence when she shared a bathroom with Jen, quote, they looked incredibly painful as they were red and swollen. And I remember wincing

[59:06] dude. Yeah. No, I was like... [59:09] I'm going to have to do this because I'm a woman, but you really, thank you for doing me that solid. Um, so, um, [59:16] Of course, you know, unsubstantiated, but there was... [59:21] We didn't hear this exact story, but this story had been out there, and then the White House has tried to say that because she had basically rescinded other allegations, because she said she was afraid for her life, that maybe she's not a reliable source. And so, oh, she said the other things weren't true. She took it back. And so there's some confusion around there. But anyway, the point is, this... [59:43] Story is why they didn't make the searchable database for all the files and left some out of there, which also ended up fucking them because obviously people knew they're withholding some of the files. Damned if you do damned if you don't. There's like the fact that we now live in a universe where these kind of stories exist. [1:00:05] are ones about the president of the United States, where we're talking about the document that connected Trump. [1:00:12] to the claim about abused nipples was among the material that came out. I also like that's what we're we now have to talk about abused nipples in the context of the president of the United States. And then I also like the J.D. Vance is like, Trump would be OK if you released the nipple related documents. Put it out. Get it out there. It's going to be better. It's going to be better to get it all out there.

[1:00:42] Hard no, J.D., not letting Nipplegate get out there. Obviously, the lurid nature of that story and the description makes it... That is what attracts your attention. But just stepping back from it all, if... [1:00:58] That is an allegation that Donald Trump was involved in. [1:01:02] with Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking of underage girls. [1:01:07] Right. And so now we have like and we're just all like, oh, well, that's that's a wild story. It's like, no, no, no. The only allegation. Right. It was it's and it's like the one person in the White House who did not want to deal with the Epstein files, did not want to deal with the strategy around transparency and what was released and what wasn't was Donald Trump. And it's like, hmm, why could that be? And he says privately to Marjorie Taylor Greene in the piece. [1:01:37] Like, yeah. Yeah. Including his best friend. Yes, exactly. His very closest friend. And then we. Yes. I mean, there are a lot of. Listen, we're just asking questions, John. [1:01:47] Yeah. I mean, look, it's all out there. It's all out there. One other data point on why Trump might not be in a great mood. I know you saw the Post story saying that the Washington Post story saying that his last medical checkup, Trump was seen by 22 different medical specialists. I did not read this whole story, but I know you wanted to.

[1:02:17] 22 doctors seems like a lot. Now, you could say, oh, Biden saw 20 doctors. [1:02:21] I think, according to Karine Jean-Pierre, his last year in office. But Biden also wasn't covering his hands in like Maybelline concealer on the daily, didn't have a rash creeping up his neck, wasn't falling asleep all the time at any hour. [1:02:36] And as, you know, addled as Biden seemed, he I don't think he approached the incoherence of Trump and certainly not with the same stakes. Like we're in the middle of a war and the global economy is in a tailspin. There's like food shortages happening around the world. People in the Philippines can't go to work five days a week because there's not enough fuel. I mean, it's like anyway, I think we should all be talking. [1:03:06] a lot more about his fitness for office. Like it's kind of crazy to me that the, the, the jabroni who fell asleep at the Knicks game gets a pass for any of it. Like it is, he increasingly shows no signs of competence in office and, well, [1:03:23] The American public deserve to have more transparency about his health. I do agree. I will also say, though, if if Donald Trump was turned out to be in 100 percent tip top shape. [1:03:35] Not fit for office. Don't think it would don't think it would be improving his performance. One percent, two percent, no percent. I think that he I think if he had if he is if he was like a physical specimen at whatever his age is to be 80 years old this weekend. If he's a physical specimen, if he had the the if he had the the constitution of a 40 year old, he would still be as bad of a president as he is right now.

[1:04:05] I concur. But it is fucking weird. It is fucking weird. It'd be good to know if he's dying. Speaking of this weekend, we'd be remiss if we didn't discuss the massive sporting event bringing Americans together in a celebration of our shared purpose and values. [1:04:19] The UFC-sponsored cage match that Donald Trump is staging on the White House lawn for his 80th birthday on Sunday. A group called Public Integrity Project is suing to try to stop the event. Not sure they'll succeed. According to the AP, the government attorneys revealed in legal filings that the UFC and other private groups have already spent $60 million on the event. That is the government saying that. They did not say how much the federal government has shelled out, but wrote that seven different agencies are involved and have, quote, [1:04:49] resources, and manpower. Most of this is, you know, UFC is footing the bill for most of this and various sponsors. But I don't know, you have seven different government agencies involved. [1:05:01] That's going to be directing some time and energy and resources that could be going to the business of the people, I suppose. [1:05:08] Again, I point you to the real grift that's happening is inside the guts of the federal government. Like there will be an accounting for it at some point. But this we should assume the very worst about what they're doing and the way they are reappropriating resources to serve Donald Trump's massive ego. The only thing I can hold out hope for, John, is first of all, I believe the cage matches on Sunday. Is that right? [1:05:31] Weigh-ins are on Saturday. I'm looking at the forecast for Washington, D.C.,

[1:05:36] 92 degrees and thunderstorms. I know. I saw that. I saw that. Because when I thought I was going, I was saying it was going to be that hot. It was a chance of thunderstorms. I don't know if the chances increased. It's a 55% chance of scattered thunderstorms in the afternoon and evening. [1:05:52] You know, I don't want to I don't want to say anything that's going to trigger any kind of karma because forecast for Chicago on Thursday at the Obama library opening one day in Chicago, it's supposed to rain heavily. Yes. But is there an outdoor cage match happening at the library that I'm unaware of? [1:06:11] David Axelrod versus Jack Lew. [1:06:17] Have you seen the pictures of the of the octagon? [1:06:21] Yes, dude. It looks like Six Flags. It's so bad. My kids didn't believe it. They were like, Mom, that's AI. You got tricked. If it wasn't on the White House line, I'd be like, that looks pretty cool. Bro, no. Don't even say that. And I'm not like a UFC fan, but like, well, it looks pretty cool. But I'm like, this is on the south line of the White House. It's also extremely funny. And just talk about the symbolism. They built a like an 800 foot octagon cage right next to the rubble of the East Wing. [1:06:51] John, the weigh-ins are happening at the Lincoln Memorial. No, I looked into this. [1:06:59] Is it getting canceled? No, the weigh-ins. So this was the organization that was filing the lawsuit got in trouble for this because they put it in the filing, too. But the press conference is being held at the Lincoln Memorial and the weigh-ins are happening at the Ellipse.

[1:07:13] Oh, fantastic. He loves the ellipse for all important things. I don't know. I am not a fan of this, but it is the country. [1:07:23] I wanted this president and some people in this country will be served by this gruesome spectacle and perhaps they will enjoy it. Or perhaps Mother Nature will have the last laugh and shoot down bolts of lightning to the south lawn of the White House, preventing the cage match from happening on Donald Trump's birthday. [1:07:39] The thing that honestly, the only thing that the story that has bothered me the most about this is the the hot troops only story that for all the for all the service members that are getting invited that have to pay. First of all, they have to pay their own way to get there. And then they have to meet a certain like weight requirement. And one defense official told CNN that they wanted to make sure they pick people who are going to look good on television. [1:08:09] grooming expert as the secretary of defense, this is the kind of stuff that you get. I, he, I wish he was just doing TikTok videos about, um, how to keep salt and pepper hair, um, [1:08:21] looking dignified. [1:08:25] But alas, he's running a war in Iran. [1:08:28] Yeah. [1:08:29] Good stuff. When we come back, you'll hear my conversation with CNN's Ron Brownstein. We will talk about the Senate map, the House map. [1:08:37] and all kinds of other good stuff.

[1:08:45] Pod Save America is brought to you by Walmart. [1:08:48] You know, we talk a lot about finding a job, but what about building a career? Walmart is actually making that happen for their associates by investing over a billion dollars in training and education. And the proof is in the numbers. Last year, more than 100,000 associates earned promotions. Add in great benefits like 401k matching and paid parental leave, and it's clear. Walmart isn't just a place to work. It's a place to grow. Go see for yourself at walmart.com slash grow at Walmart. That's walmart.com slash grow at Walmart. [1:09:17] In moments like these, it's easy to feel overwhelmed and even easier to feel powerless, but we are neither. I'm Stacey Abrams, and on my podcast, Assembly Required, I take on each executive action, legislative battle, and breaking news moment by asking three questions. [1:09:36] What's really happening? [1:09:37] What can we do about it? [1:09:39] And how do we keep going? [1:09:40] Together. [1:09:42] This is a space for clarity, strategy, and hope. [1:09:46] rooted in action. [1:09:47] not denial. [1:09:49] New episodes of Assembly Required drop Tuesdays. Tune in wherever you get your podcasts and on YouTube. [1:09:56] This is the Cocoa Beach on Florida Space Coast podcast. I'm Kelly Bowman and I have been chasing the stories, meeting the people and uncovering the little details that help you explore this place like a local. And the more time you spend here, you realize it's not just a beach. The shoreline is a launch pad for catching waves and watching rockets lift into space. Open your free iHeartRadio app, search Cocoa Beach on Florida Space Coast, and search for the iHeartRadio.com.

[1:10:25] And listen now. [1:10:30] Ron Brownstein, welcome back to Pod Save America. Hey, good to be with John. So, since you're one of the smartest political analysts out there, [1:10:37] Wanted to check in. [1:10:39] Get your thoughts on the primaries we've had and the midterms ahead of us. Maybe we can start big picture. Where are we right now, a little less than five months until the midterms? How does this political environment compare to where we were in 2018, which was the last midterm when Democrats faced an unpopular Donald Trump and did quite well? That is a really good place to, I think, the right point of comparison. [1:11:09] collision between the irresistible force and the immovable object. And both of them, both the irresistible force and the immovable object are getting stronger as we go. The irresistible force is the widespread disapproval of Trump and dissatisfaction with the economy. You know, if you go back to 2018 in the exit poll, Trump's approval rating was 45%. It is not going to be 45% in all likelihood on election day this year. I mean, it may not be as low as it is now in the high 30s, but you know, I think at best, it's going to be in the low 40s. [1:11:39] So Trump is probably going to be more unpopular [1:11:41] today than he was on Election Day in 2018. Second, you know, in the 2018 exit poll, two-thirds of voters described the economy in positive terms. [1:11:51] Even as Democrats were winning 40 plus House seats, it's probably going to be two thirds describing it in negative terms.

[1:11:59] this time. So I think, you know, if you think of those kind of attitudes as the motor that drives the wave, there's every reason to believe the Democratic, now the Democratic, overall Democratic performance will be even better, I think, than the wave behind them is even stronger than it was in 2018. I will put one caveat on that in a minute. But so like the wave looks to me like it could [1:12:29] When Trump was at 45, could they win the popular vote by more if he's at 41 or 42 and two thirds of the country is dissatisfied with the economy? I think that's possible. Now. [1:12:39] The other side of the equation is the immovable object, which is that to a greater extent than in 2018, this election is being fought out on Republican terrain. [1:12:47] right? In 2018, you had what about two dozen House Republicans and districts that voted for Clinton two years earlier. Now, before there were districting, you only had three and even kind of more broadly. In 2018, you still had the remnants [1:13:04] of all of these House Republicans who were holding on in suburban white collar districts outside of the South, even in the South, I guess, a couple, mostly outside of the South, that had been voting Democratic at the presidential level since Bill Clinton. And Democrats really cleaned them out in 2018. Three quarters of the House seats that Democrats won in 2018 had more white college graduates than the national average.

[1:13:34] The Republicans cleaned out the last [1:13:36] blue dog Democrats who are surviving in heavily blue collar rural districts that have been voting Republican for 20, 30 years. And they kind of wiped all of them out. And then Democrats in 2018 did the same with the kind of suburban in the 90s. They used to call Gypsy Moth Republicans. So as a result, there really aren't that many more of those white collar seats left to win in 2026. [1:14:06] He said Democrats are targeting this year in the House. [1:14:09] in very distinct counterpoint to 2018, have more non-college whites than the national average. And of course, that is a real challenge. I mean, you know, you look at districts in Ohio and Iowa and Michigan and Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. [1:14:22] That is a big chunk of what Democrats are trying to win back. And most of those seats are more heavily white blue collar than the national average. Same story in the Senate, by the way, eight of the 10 seats that both sides consider the most competitive in the Senate. I wrote about this a few months ago, have more blue collar whites than the national average. And, you know, if you kind of look at it by presidential vote, you have Maine. And as we've talked about before, let me just take one step back. [1:14:52] You know, Senate results and presidential vote are just much more correlated than when even you got started in this, much less me. You know, there are 25 states that voted three times for Donald Trump. [1:15:04] Republicans now have all 50 of their Senate seats, which obviously makes it tough. I mean, you got a seating 50 seats at the start, you know, is a pretty narrow pathway. There are 19 states that voted three times against Trump.

[1:15:15] Democrats have 37 of their 38, with Susan Collins as the last exception. And then there are six states that have flipped back and forth at any time in the three Trump races, and Democrats now have 10 of their 12 Senate seats. And that is very much the way... [1:15:29] I look at the Senate. The job for the Democrats is, first of all, to beat Susan Collins, to get rid of the last... [1:15:35] Republican left in the 30, among the 38 in the states that voted three times against Trump. They've got to defend two seats. [1:15:42] in the flip states, which is Georgia and Michigan, [1:15:45] But ultimately, they have to break into, not only in the near term, but in the long term, because it's obviously not... [1:15:51] You know, it's not a not a plausible strategy to give 50 seats away at the start. They have to break back into the Trump three time states. So what do you got? You have North Carolina, [1:16:00] which he only won narrowly. [1:16:01] But after that, every other state they have to win in the Senate, Trump won by double digits two years ago. [1:16:08] which is not easy. So that's probably in order... [1:16:12] North Carolina, Alaska, Ohio, Texas, Iowa... [1:16:16] right? And if you don't win Maine, if you don't convert Maine, and you and I are in different places about Maine, we should probably talk about it at some point. If you don't convert Maine, you got to win three Senate seats and states Trump won by double digits two years ago. And that that's asking a lot. So overall, I would say [1:16:32] Democrats, the conditions are more favorable to Democrats than in 2018, with the exception that you've had the Biden presidency in the middle. And that definitely took, you know, put a dent in the Democratic image that matters. I think the party outside of the White House, their image matters less than the performance of the president in the midterm. But nonetheless, it's there.

[1:16:52] conditions should be overall better for Democrats, but the Republicans have built stronger defenses, both in terms of the inherent nature of the playing field and also the gerrymandering that's happened. Yeah, let's... [1:17:05] That's a very good summary of where we are right now. So thank you. Let's let's dive into Maine. That was my next question anyway, because, you know, we had the primary this week. Also, as you mentioned, like you've been sounding the alarm about the electoral risk Democrats are taking with Graham Plattner. And since everyone's heard enough of my not quite as worried view, I want to I want folks to hear a good, smart counter. [1:17:35] you want to call her. As I said, she is the only Republican left in the 19 states that voted three times against Trump. 37 to 1. She's the one. In Trump's first term, she was the only Republican senator or challenger [1:17:51] According to the exit polls, who won in a state where more people disapproved than approved of his performance as president. She was also the only Republican Senate incumbent or challenger to hold their Democratic opponent to less than 89 percent of the people who disapproved of Trump. Sarah Gideon in 2020 only won 71 votes. [1:18:11] percent of Trump disapprovers. Every other Democratic Senate candidate during the first Trump term won at least 89 percent of Trump disapprovers. You know, [1:18:19] And that relationship is not getting weaker generally. Jay Jones in Virginia won 89% of Trump disapprovers. Cheryl and Spanberger won 93%, 94% of Trump disapprovers. There was a poll from the University of Massachusetts at Lowell

[1:18:38] Even before the latest rounds of revelations about sexting and the New York Times story about his relationship with former partners that found Plattner winning 74%. [1:18:50] of Trump disapprovers in Maine. That is Susan Collins' superpower. She is able to get, to a greater extent than any Republican anywhere, she is able to get, any other Republican anywhere, she's able to get voters who disapprove of Trump. [1:19:05] to vote for her, especially older women. And the key to her, why did she win in 2020 in a state where Trump's disapproval in the exit poll was 58% and obviously Biden won the state by I think nine points. The reason is because she ran really far ahead of Trump among older white women, both in the exit poll and the AP vote cast are two major sources of voter behavior at the state level. [1:19:31] Colin's [1:19:32] Gideon ran 15 points behind Biden among women 45 plus. Now, when I started doing that, doing this in the 80s, things like that happened. They don't happen anymore. You do not have a major demographic group that veers off by 15 points between how they view the president and how they view other candidates. You know, that's why Republicans have all 50 Senate seats in the 25 states. Trump won three times, not because they're all great candidates. It's [1:19:59] Those attitudes really shape things. So Plattner seems to me... [1:20:03] I would not say, you cannot say Platinum can't win. [1:20:07] that in this environment, Trump is weaker than he was in 2020. His disapproval is now over 60 in Maine. And Collins is weaker than she was in 2020 because, you know, she, Brett Kavanaugh in the interim between 2020 and now voted to overturn Roe v. Wade after she stood on the Senate forum, promised she would, she would not, he would not. So,

[1:20:27] I would not say Plattner can't win. I will say that Plattner makes it a lot harder than it has to be because his vulnerabilities, I think, map ominously over her strengths. I mean, I look at older white women as a prime audience to be worried about all of the things. [1:20:44] that have come out of that. And I also think, and I haven't talked about this as much, I think his strengths are less relevant in Maine than they might be elsewhere. I mean, if the guy's strength is that he, you know, and it does seem legit that he can mobilize a lot of younger non voters, kind of a Trump thing in reverse. [1:21:03] I mean, I mean, this isn't Georgia or Texas or, you know, even Wisconsin, where you have a huge pool of non-voting young people. You have like the second or third oldest electorate in the country. I mean, your job. [1:21:17] The job of a Democrat in Maine in 2026. [1:21:21] is not to mobilize new voters, [1:21:24] It's not even to persuade a majority that Trump and the Republicans are taking the country in the wrong direction, because a majority, a big majority already believe that. [1:21:32] in Maine. The job of the Democratic Senate candidate in Maine is to reassure [1:21:37] the majority who already think Trump [1:21:40] and the Republicans are taking the state in the wrong direction, that it's okay to vote against Collins, and that you are a reasonable alternative. And I think Plattner, again, he could win, but he introduces a tremendous amount of risk in that equation that doesn't need to be there. He has until July 13th. [1:21:56] talked about this under main law. They can't push him out at this point, but he has until July 13th to step aside. And as I pointed out in a column this week,

[1:22:05] They've had they have really good candidates in the gubernatorial primary. Four candidates got over 20 percent of the vote in the first round, including three who have very broad support. [1:22:15] on the left. And I do think that if there are [1:22:18] more negative stories that come out, or if simply there are a lot of polls that raise [1:22:23] you know, worrying, [1:22:25] direction between now and then. [1:22:28] it would be in the interest of Democrats to kind of look at some of those alternatives. Because I do think [1:22:35] and this will really get the mailbag. I do think that the forces that are the national forces behind Plattner, particularly the Sanders-Warren- [1:22:45] orbit are so determined to prove that their model is the right model for how Democrats come back, that they have lost sight of the actual human being. [1:22:55] that they are... [1:22:56] betting on and the place that they are testing it. And they seem to me more interested in beating Schumer in the primary than in beating Collins in the general. It's funny. My question. [1:23:06] Um, [1:23:07] I wouldn't say my bullishness. I would say I'm not as bearish as you. And the reason is actually has nothing to do with thinking that the Sanders model is the model or this is the proving ground for that. I actually think that just to talk about Collins, right? So she's never been this unpopular, right? [1:23:29] She's never run... [1:23:31] a competitive race [1:23:33] with a midterm electorate. [1:23:35] Which is like a whole new thing, as you know. Right. And so we keep talking about the Sarah Gideon example. But the Sarah Gideon example is in 2020 when you've got a whole presidential electorate, which, as we know, and we've talked about in the audience probably knows by now, is is just in this era better for Republicans. Right. Because you bring out more of the non-college, less engaged voters. Generally speaking, midterm elections, the electorate is two, three, even four points more college educated than the presidential, the previous presidential.

[1:24:05] And then you have a midterm electorate. So now she's running in her first competitive midterm electorate and one that is... [1:24:12] this favorable to Democrats. And the state has moved left since 2020. And I think in 2024, Maine's swing right, [1:24:21] was maybe the one of the smallest, if not the smallest in the country. Those are all the reasons, as I say, he can win. There's no question he can win. [1:24:31] Given the overall climate, given the specific, as you say, [1:24:35] Collins is weaker than she was in 2020. Trump is more unpopular than he was in 2020 in Maine. So you can't say that any Democrat can't win. It's just that this is much more of a jump ball than it should be. [1:24:46] because of his unique vulnerabilities. I kind of like... Are you surprised at how weak... [1:24:53] Mills was and still is in all these polls. I mean, even that poll, there was a poll out right before the primary where I think that Mills was like the first poll where Mills did slightly better than Plattner against Collins, but still by only like one point, two points. Like, I don't get how that is. Mills doing that poorly and Gideon doing that poorly also makes me think, like, what is it about [1:25:14] those candidates who seem like they should fit the older women in Maine sort of voter model that you were talking about. Yeah, I mean, I think I'm not an expert on Mills' relationships in the state, but there's no question she's conflicted pretty consistently with a lot of the same liberal groups in the state.

[1:25:37] that are that are promoting Plattner. And, you know, would would one of the other alternatives in the governor race have done better against him in the end than Mills did? [1:25:49] I think I think that's, you know, I mean, Hannah Pingree, former Speaker of the House, Troy Jackson, Bernie endorsed in the governor race, former Senate president. And then Sheena Bellows, who is now the secretary of state, who was kind of the sacrificial lamb against Collins in 2014 when she was much younger. And at that point, I think had only been the head of the state ACLU. [1:26:10] Um, [1:26:11] You know, the thing about Mills is... The thing I felt about Mills was that if she got to the general election, it wasn't clear to me what Collins would run against her on. Like, if she was one point ahead now... [1:26:25] The thing about the thing about Plattner is he gives them a lot to work with and it may not prove this positive. It may be that everything else is sufficient, but it introduced, you know, to put him over the top, but it introduced a level of risk that I think is just. [1:26:42] unnecessary. And I think, like I said, I feel like many of the national forces in particular that are pushing Plattner are just so determined to show that this is the right way for Democrats to win that they are not willing to acknowledge, A, this may not be the right place to test the [1:27:03] You know, candidates are not just... [1:27:07] It's like baseball. You could be the greatest prospect in the world. You actually got to go out and do it. And the realities that he is presenting them with, they are just powering through. And people say, well, you know, switching to Kamala Harris didn't work that well.

[1:27:19] late in '24. [1:27:21] I would say it worked out better than trying to stay the course. [1:27:25] I'm not sure that Alyssa Slotkin and Ruben Gallego and Jackie Rosen wouldn't say it worked out pretty well. [1:27:31] But this is, I was thinking about that. [1:27:33] To me, between now and July 13th, [1:27:36] The easier scenario in some ways is if there are, if like a ton of really damaging stories or even one story that's much more damaging comes out and suddenly you see polls where he's down five, six, seven, eight, right? Then it becomes like fairly easy, not easy, but easier for Democrats in Maine, which would have to be to like go to the campaign and try to convince them to drop out. [1:28:06] you polls showing it tied or he's a point or two behind and then there's no big stories or maybe just one kind of in the middle story. Then it's really hard to go to someone who did better. [1:28:16] in the primary than Sarah Gideon did when she was facing two kind of no names in 2020 and say, OK, you got more votes than the last nominee against Susan Collins, but now we're going to make now we should push you aside because we're worried. Like that to me is the tougher that that introduces another that introduces risk that I think is greater maybe than the risk we have right now. To the extent it is Republicans and not the media who has access to more damaging information. They're not going to put it out before July. Certainly not. [1:28:46] I don't know, but maybe they won't. Yeah, on their own.

[1:28:50] You know, look, like I like we keep saying, he can win. [1:28:55] There's no guarantee he's going to win. And he gives he gives her [1:28:59] he gives her an opportunity to play the card she's played before. I mean, it's, you know, I mean, it's, you know, and, and, like, like, like we say, you know, the, you know, the, [1:29:10] If you don't win Maine, you've got to win three out of four in Alaska, Ohio, Texas, and Iowa. I mean, that's asking a lot. [1:29:18] I mean, in the long run... [1:29:20] Democrats have to start competing again in these heavily blue-collar Trump three-time states. But, you know, flipping... And maybe... [1:29:28] The war goes on, gas prices stay high, Trump stays under 40. Like if Trump stays under 40, [1:29:34] Yeah, I could see them flipping three of those four conceivably. But if he gets back to the low 40s, which I still would bet on on Election Day, that, you know, that's that's asking a lot to win three of those four states. Well, let's let's leave Maine and talk about those four states. I think you sort of ordered them earlier quickly, but I would just like, you know, you have financial decisions if you're the Democrats. Like Texas is a very expensive, very big state to compete in. [1:30:04] Iowa, not as much. Ohio is obviously, they're going to go all in in Ohio. How do you look at those four states in terms of feasibility in flipping them? [1:30:15] So you've got North Carolina, which looks pretty good for Democrats now. I mean, I think Republicans could end up pulling the plug there. So to me, as I said to you before, in Trump's first term...

[1:30:25] Susan Collins is the only Republican who won in a state where, according to the exit poll, more people disapproved than approved of his performance. So if you're thinking about Alaska, Ohio, California. [1:30:35] Iowa and Texas, they're all probably going to be right at the tipping point either. He's either going to be slightly above 50 or. [1:30:43] maybe more likely below 50. I mean, you know, I saw, was it the argument that knew that, you know, LaCasha Jane and my former colleague at the Atlantic Jerusalem, they tried to use their polling to [1:30:57] project Trump's approval in all of in all 50 states, and they had him seven points or more negative in all four of those states. And if that's the case, Democrats have a shot in any of them. Now, if you're going to rank them, I think Peltola is an unusually good candidate. [1:31:12] Alaska has kind of unusual population dynamics. It really doesn't have a huge white blue collar [1:31:18] population. So I think Alaska is the strongest. By conventional measures, you'd have to say Ohio is the second. I mean, you know, Ohio is a big blue collar population. It's like 50, 51% of the electorate will be whites without a college degree, even in a midterm year. Now, maybe that will go down to 49 this time. And if you look at Sherrod Brown, [1:31:43] When he won in 2018, he won 45% of non-college whites. When he lost in 2024, he won 35% of them. [1:31:51] So it doesn't get all the way back to 45, but he does have to get somewhere north

[1:31:56] of [1:31:57] 40 probably. [1:31:58] to win. That is possible. I mean, you know, one thing we should have said before, when I was talking about the irresistible force, not only is Trump's overall approval rating down, [1:32:08] it is well below where it has been among those non-college whites. So like even in 28, you know, he won two thirds of whites without a college degree in all three of his races. Even in 2018, again, according to the exit poll, his approval rating among non-college whites was 61%. Now, in every national poll, it is right at 50-50. [1:32:26] either and usually slightly below 50 50 at best 51 48 something like that's like the best and then there have been polls where he's been as low as 46 among non-college whites. [1:32:38] If that's if he stays there till November, Sherrod Brown can win. I mean, you can win. And people should. [1:32:45] take into account that when I say Trump is basically a 50/50 among non-college whites nationwide, well that includes evangelical Christians. [1:32:54] most of whom are non-college whites and are heavily concentrated in the South. There aren't as many of them in Ohio. [1:33:00] So if Trump is at 50/50 among non-college whites nationally, he's probably going to be below 50/50. [1:33:06] in Ohio. [1:33:07] Which makes it possible for Shara Brown. And this is like what I was saying about Maine. [1:33:12] Sherrod lost in a presidential turnout year where you have a greater share of non-college whites coming into the electorate than you do in 2018 when he won, which was a midterm year. And then you have fewer non-college whites as a share. And I think I think Trump's approval will be lower today than it was in 2018 in Ohio. You know, the difference is Sherrod's been around the block a little. So there may be a little tread off the tire in terms of how voters are looking at him. I kind of feel like that's going to be the tipping point.

[1:33:42] if either Plattner steps aside for someone more electable or they kind of stabilize things and are able to just pound. Do you really want to give Donald Trump another vote to put another Brett Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court, which seems to me their best argument? Then you look at Ohio and I'm sorry, Iowa and Texas, Iowa. [1:34:00] is Ohio, but even tougher because in Ohio, roughly 20% of the voters are non-white and in Iowa, it's only like eight or nine. The non-college whites are more like 56, 57% of the vote in Iowa compared to like 50, 51 in Ohio. And more of those non-college whites in Iowa are evangelical Christians. [1:34:20] than they are in OSO. Like by every measure [1:34:24] I can't see Turek winning before Brown wins. Like if, [1:34:28] If Turek wins, the wave is big enough that Brown is going to win. Texas... [1:34:33] is intriguing, right? I mean, you know, if you if you look at again, like I love how you started with 2018 Beto is in 2018 versus Ted Cruz, Beto O'Rourke. [1:34:44] is kind of the template for any kind of competitive statewide race for Democrats in Texas. Since then, the state has added three and a half million, I think is the number, new voters. [1:34:54] and almost all of them are people of color. It's like 90%. [1:34:59] of the new voters and their metro, right? I mean, they're, they're like, they're in those four big metros. Betta won the four big metros, didn't win them by quite enough. Now, so, you know, Richard Murray, who I love, a professor emeritus at the University of Houston, been new in Texas politics since, you know,

[1:35:17] before either of us. He says that if all the groups, all the major groups in the electorate [1:35:24] Non-college whites, college whites, Latinos, black, Asian, all vote the same way they did in 2018, but vote in the numbers they are present at today. Beto would win. [1:35:34] But the problem is, can you really get back [1:35:39] to where Beto was among Latino voters, which was the low sixties. You're probably, you're going to Trump. [1:35:45] Trump won Texas Latinos... [1:35:47] in 2024, which is kind of remarkably one, like probably 55% of them. [1:35:52] That's not going to happen. [1:35:54] Tallarico is going to win them. But is he going to get back over 60? [1:35:58] You know, I mean, there was another poll out yesterday that Siena poll only had him at like 52. I don't think it's going to be that low. But is he going to get back to 60? I kind of feel like. [1:36:08] the ball game in Texas. And in Texas, you know, a very large share of the non-college whites are evangelicals. [1:36:15] The fact that Tallarico, you know, is a seminarian is not really going to help because he's a different kind of seminarian. I mean, the, you know, Texas blue collar evangelicals do not want to hear that God is non-binary, although. [1:36:27] seems like a perfectly defensible argument. I think the key is going to be [1:36:34] Can you get a few points more out of the suburban... [1:36:37] college educated voters around Dallas, Houston, Austin and San Antonio. Beto got like 44 or 45 percent of college whites in 2018.

[1:36:50] can Tallarico push that up to 47, 48 against Paxton? You know, the other dynamic about Paxton is... [1:36:58] I mean, I forget which ones you probably might remember, but out of Slotkin, Rosen, Baldwin, [1:37:05] Diego, the four Democrats who won in states where Biden lost, several of them did not get more votes than Harris. [1:37:12] right? It was just Republicans skipped [1:37:15] The Senate race. [1:37:16] And that... [1:37:17] You know, it's hard to see a lot of Texas Republicans voting for Tallarico. It's not hard to see a few of them voting for Abbott and skipping Paxton or skipping Paxton and jumping down to Abbott. You can squint and see how this works where like... [1:37:31] Some of them leave the Senate race blank. [1:37:34] He gets up, he bumps up his numbers in the suburbs by a little, a few more than Beto did. And then he gets that Latino number, maybe if not all the way at 60, right? [1:37:45] Yeah, 58. And then that's enough. Yeah. By the way, as people point out all the time, if they are a larger share of the vote than they were in 2018 Latinos, you can get a bigger net vote out of that community, even with a smaller share. You don't have to match the share, but matching the share would help. I don't think that's going to happen. I don't think Democrats can get back to 62, 63, maybe among Texas. I was down in South Texas a few weeks ago and, you know, there's a lot of economic discontent. There's a lot of ice discontent. [1:38:14] Um, [1:38:15] And I think, you know, my CNN column for later this week, tomorrow's news today, I think subtraction is going to be a bigger issue in this election than addition. I don't think you're going to add a lot of new Democratic votes, either with new voters coming out or with Republicans who voted for Trump in 24 switching to vote for Democrats. But you could subtract a lot of Republican votes. I mean, Trump's.

[1:38:41] According to one of the stats I'm kind of unveiling in this column later this week, among Hispanics who voted for Trump, [1:38:50] His approval rating now is 66%. [1:38:53] Right? That is not so good. Among all, remember all of the focus on the non-college, non-white voters and how this was kind of the augers of the realignment. His approbating among non-college, non-whites who voted for him. [1:39:08] is 68%. Among non-college non-whites who didn't vote in '24, his approval rating is [1:39:14] Yeah, I saw that in the New York Times-Siena poll. Those numbers were the worst. Yeah, among non-voters... [1:39:21] In the New York Times-Ciena poll among non-voters in 24, people who either skipped it or who have become eligible since, he's at 21-71 in job approval. [1:39:29] So, you know, I'm not sure. [1:39:32] You know, this is 2018 was another thing that was unique about 2018. [1:39:36] is you did have this enormous surge of new voters. Catalyst says 13% of all the voters in 2018 had not voted before. Census says [1:39:45] Turnout in 2018 was 10 points higher than in either of the Obama. [1:39:49] midterms. It was 50%. [1:39:52] as opposed to 40% in the Obama midterms. So there was this surge of new voters. That's where I think the Biden experience is going to really [1:39:59] hurt. I mean, because, you know, if you were a 21 year old in 2018, you had Obama as your counterpoint to Trump. [1:40:09] And it was like, yeah, we passed universal health care or we did this or we did that. Now you've got Biden and, you know, whatever...

[1:40:16] Rightly or wrongly, most Americans think that was not a successful presidency. So at a point where... [1:40:23] Young people in particular are very negative on Trump or are also pretty negative on what they remember out of Biden. I don't see that big surge. [1:40:30] that Democrats had in 2018 [1:40:33] repeating itself. [1:40:34] What I do think is a very clear and present danger [1:40:38] to Republicans is that the voters in their coalition who are disappointed with Trump [1:40:44] Some of them are going to switch to voting for Democrats. [1:40:47] But I don't think even many Democrats are expecting too many of them. [1:40:50] You know, only only six percent of voters in 22, according to Pew, voted for a House candidate from the party opposite that they voted for president in 20. [1:40:59] It's not that big anymore. The real swing voters are the people who cycle in and out of the electorate. [1:41:04] And they express their discontent by staying home. And I think [1:41:08] That is a real risk for Republicans everywhere. But Texas is a very good place where you could have a lot... I could see... [1:41:15] A lot of those Latino first time Trump voters in South Texas, just like. [1:41:21] Uh [1:41:22] You know, yeah. Sitting out. Sitting out. All right, well, we'll leave it there. All right. Thank you for joining and making us smarter. And everyone check out Ron's column at CNN. And I know you've got a column at Bloomberg as well. So you're all over the place. A little bit about Graham Fattner at Bloomberg, yeah. It's great. It'll be great. So everyone take a look at that. And thanks again for coming by. We'll do it again before we get closer to November. Absolutely. Good to be with you, John.

[1:41:52] . [1:41:54] That's our show for today. Alex. [1:41:55] Lovely, as always, to do the pod with you. Such a delight. Two in a row, man. I know. But I got to say, this show's a lot of work. Dan Pfeiffer needs to get his butt back into the chair, huh? This is like the longest Dan's been away from politics. I wonder if he's somewhere just getting the shakes or hives or something. [1:42:12] Dan, send up two flares and you can still hear us. We love you, Dan. We miss you, Dan. We do. Thank you for letting me warm the mic while you were away. And thank you for warming the mic. You've been a fantastic addition. [1:42:25] my friend, to help us navigate these choppy, insane waters of our American democracy. Have a good weekend, everyone. Love it. We'll be back with an episode of Pod Save America Sunday. He's talking to David Sedaris. How about that? [1:42:38] Nixon 5. [1:42:39] Yeah, okay. And then Tommy and I will be back with a new show on Tuesday. Bye, everyone. Mixing five. [1:43:06] In moments like these, it's easy to feel overwhelmed and even easier to feel powerless. But we are neither. I'm Stacey Abrams, and on my podcast, Assembly Required, I take on each executive action, legislative battle, and breaking news moment by asking three questions.

[1:43:26] What's really happening? [1:43:28] What can we do about it? [1:43:29] And how do we keep going? [1:43:31] Together. [1:43:32] This is a space for clarity, strategy, and hope. [1:43:36] Rooted in Action. [1:43:38] not denial. [1:43:39] New episodes of Assembly Required drop Tuesdays. Tune in wherever you get your podcasts and on YouTube. [1:43:47] This is the Cocoa Beach on Florida Space Coast podcast. I'm Kelly Bowman and I have been chasing the stories, meeting the people and uncovering the little details that help you explore this place like a local. And the more time you spend here, you realize it's not just a beach. The shoreline is a launch pad for catching waves and watching rockets lift into space. Open your free iHeartRadio app, search Cocoa Beach on Florida Space Coast, and search for the show. [1:44:16] And listen now. [1:44:17] service opens doors and at American military university it can open doors for the whole family if you have a loved one who served in the military you may qualify for reduced tuition [1:44:28] AMU offers flexible online programs designed to fit your schedule so you can keep moving forward wherever life takes you. [1:44:35] Learn more at amu.apus.edu slash military. [1:44:40] Open doors to the future for you and your family with the help of American Military University.